The June 2017 paper typically had four to five questions. The mark scheme details:
Categorize your errors:
The "AC" in ACCN4 often refers to the assessment of core concepts—a staple of the Global Politics curriculum. The June 2017 scheme provided granular detail on how these concepts were weighted. ib g jun17 accn4 mark scheme
For example, in questions dealing with Power, the scheme did not accept simple definitions (e.g., "power is the ability to influence"). Instead, it demanded a nuanced application of concepts—Hard vs. Soft power, Smart power, or structural power dynamics—applied to specific, real-world scenarios prevalent in 2017 (such as the South China Sea disputes or the early Trump administration’s foreign policy shifts). Report: IB G Jun17 ACCN4 Mark Scheme 2
The mark scheme’s "indicative content" section serves as a time capsule, listing the likely examples students would use. However, it notably allowed for "alternative valid responses," a feature that democratized the exam: a student in Singapore could use an ASEAN example, while a student in Europe could use NATO, provided the analysis was sound. Answer – The correct numerical or written response
Open the mark scheme. Do not give yourself "half credit" for a number that is close. Be strict: