Cadmould Vs Moldflow New //free\\ 90%

Here’s a balanced, technical review comparing Cadmould (from SimpaTec, now part of CoreTech System) with the newer iterations of Moldflow (Autodesk Moldflow 2024+), written from the perspective of a simulation engineer or injection molding specialist.

Overview

For decades, Moldflow has been the 800-pound gorilla in injection molding simulation. But Cadmould—especially since its deeper integration with CoreTech’s Moldex3D solver technology—has evolved into a serious, nimble competitor. Here’s how they stack up in their latest versions.

5. Industry Adoption

| Industry | Preferred Tool | Reason | | :--- | :--- | :--- | | Automotive (Tier 1) | Moldflow (80% share) | Required by OEMs (Ford, GM, Tesla) for material certification | | Medical | Cadmould (growing) | Quick validation, excellent for micro molding | | Consumer Electronics | Moldflow | Warpage prediction for thin-wall housings | | Mold Making (SME) | Cadmould | Integrated into SolidWorks, fast setup | | Research / Academia | Moldflow | More published benchmarks, material models | cadmould vs moldflow new

6. The Verdict: Which do you buy in 2025?

Buy Moldflow IF:

• You are a tier-1 automotive supplier forced to use it by the OEM (Ford, GM, BMW specify Moldflow results).
• You mold large, thick structural parts with long glass fiber (e.g., battery trays, seat backs).
• You need access to the largest public material database (20,000+ grades).

Buy Cadmould IF:

• You are in medical devices, electronics, or micro-molding (thin walls, high precision).
• You use Gas/Water assist or Multi-component molding regularly.
• You are tired of mesh healing and want "CAD-to-Result" in under 30 minutes.
• You hate subscription software and want to own your license.

Simcon Cadmould (The "Design" Approach)

• Philosophy: Cadmould focuses on the "Concurrent Engineering" approach. It is designed to feel like a natural extension of the design process rather than a separate laboratory.
• Workflow: The "Virtual Machine" concept. Users define the injection molding machine characteristics and mold layout quickly. The workflow emphasizes rapid iterations—change a dimension, re-run, view result in minutes.
• Learning Curve: Lower barrier to entry. The logic follows the actual injection molding process (clamp the mold, inject, cool, eject) which is intuitive for mechanical engineers.
• Interface: Modern, visually streamlined interface. It offers a 3D PDF report generator that creates highly visual, interactive reports that are easier for non-specialists to interpret than raw data plots.

Winner: Cadmould for ease of use and integration; Moldflow for depth of control for dedicated analysts.

Choose Cadmould if:

• You are a mold designer or product engineer who does simulation as a secondary task.
• You work inside SolidWorks, NX, or Creo daily.
• You need fast iteration (5-10 design variants per day).
• Your parts are amorphous materials (ABS, PC, PMMA) with minor warpage.
• You want perpetual license or lower annual cost.

Verdict

Choose Cadmould (latest) if:

• You are a design engineer or small-to-mid tool shop needing fast, reliable results inside your CAD software.
• Mesh headaches are your biggest time-waster.
• You run mostly standard thermoplastics and need good warpage prediction without PhD-level tuning.

Choose New Moldflow if:

• You have a dedicated simulation expert.
• You work with exotic materials, very thin walls, or need ISO/ASTM validation.
• Presentation-quality results matter to your clients or leadership.

Mesh Technology

• Moldflow: Uses Dual Domain (midplane-like) and 3D Tetrahedral. The 3D mesh is robust but requires careful repair for complex thin parts.
• Cadmould: Uses True 3D only (voxel/solid elements). Key advantage: No need to create a midplane. Extremely fast automatic meshing directly from solid CAD.